Hi @Marcel.Ausan Yes, this is possible. The PO includes lines originated from several MPRs.But assume my MPR number is X including 10 lines but navigate to the PO and query from my requisition number X, then lines show more than 10. (same issue for the PR - X; it includes more than 10 lines) My concern is how does the MPR includes a less number of lines than PR & PO.
Hi Nikila, Thank you for the details. But it seems that the mentioned post is related to the intersite flow starting from the External CO. But in here, it is starting from the Internal PO and ends with external PO. So as per the requirement, if we start changes from internal PO, then it should be moved to other orders. And also, changes made to external PO should be restricted.
Hi @Nikila Dis ,Thank you for the reply.But it is already unticked before doing the changes. However, still you can edit values when the status is Partially Authorized for No Part lines.When the same authorization rule is fetched to Part Lines, then you can’t edit values and the above-mentioned error is triggered.I just need to clear out why this error is not triggered for No Part Requisitions Lines. Thanks.
To all the IFS experts out there?Any insights/thoughts/logic as to why this is NOT triggered at the PR level, but still fetches the pricing information from the supplier agreement?
Hi @AsankaGaru Thank you for the reply.It seems like this is a bug in the standard Aurena system.Though the status is changed to YES, the PR is not changed the status from Closed.
Hi @AsankaGaru Thank you for the respond. But the Deny option is not visible in the header level.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
